Nigeria-Russia cooperation agreement on nuclear plants unacceptable -ERA
The Environmental Rights
Action/Friends of the Earth Nigeria (ERA/FoEN) has criticized the Nigerian
government’s cooperation agreement with Russia’s ROSATOM to build four nuclear
power plants in the country despite inherent dangers and at a time most civilized
nations are exploring safe renewables.
A release from the communications
department of ROSATOM (see link: http://www.rosatom.ru/en/press-centre/news/russia-and-nigeria-signed-an-inter-governmental
agreement-about-construction-of-a-center-for-nuclear/n) stated that the
Nigeria-Russia deal was brokered on 30 May 2016 on the sidelines of the VIII
International Forum ATOMEXPO 2016 which held May 30-June 1, 2016 in Moscow and
will start with the construction of a Center for Nuclear Research and
Technology in Sheba, Abuja.
The agreement provides for the
construction of a center with the two-circuit pool-type reactor of the Russian
design and a nominal power rating of 10 MW in Sheba, Abuja. Four nuclear plants
that ROSATOM will build will cost about $80billion, with the first expected to
be ready by 2025. The other three will be ready by 2035.
In the release, Franklin Erepamo
Osaisai, chairman and CEO of the Nigeria Atomic Energy Commission (NAEC) said
the plants will be financed by ROSATOM, which will then build, own, operate and
transfer them to the Nigerian government which will enter a power-purchasing
agreement. Kogi and Akwa Ibom States are to host the plants.
But in a reaction to the
development, ERA/FoEN said the decision of the Nigerian government to experiment
with the nuclear option is not only shocking, but also a betrayal of the
Nigerian people who have roundly rejected the dangerous path since the
technology is unsafe and by virtue of its total control by the Russian firm,
will create a state within the Nigerian state.
ERA/FoEN executive director,
Godwin Uyi Ojo said, “We are miffed that a cooperation agreement on this
dangerous experiment has been reached despite the aversion of Nigerians to the
nuclear option for generating power. We reject it and refuse to be led into a
radioactive misadventure that western countries that hitherto experimented are
weaning themselves off and exploring safe renewable.”
Ojo noted that with the Chernobyl
and recent Fukushima incident in Japan still fresh in the mind, the Nigerian
and Russian promoters of the project have neither consulted Nigerians nor taken
into cognizance the fact that the project will ultimately tie the country to
the whims of the Russian vendor which can be described as the Russian Ministry
of Atomic Energy.
“We also gathered that the huge cost
associated with the plants also leaves much to be desired because one facility
of the kind and capacity that ROSATOM is planning to construct in Nigeria is
about 7 billion euros in Finland while same goes for $20 billion here.”
Ojo explained that ERA/FoEN was
part of a team of environmental activists and journalists who visited the
proposed 1,200 MW Hanhikivi nuclear power plant in Pyhajoki, Finland being
constructed by ROSATOM and at the venue expressed misgivings about the project
and total aversion of Nigerians to building same in Nigeria.
In Finland, the issue of how the
spent nuclear fuel will be managed is now a burning question among local
activists who staged resistance rallies against the planned construction in
July.
Ojo pointed out that other issues
that readily pop up are how the wastes will also be managed in Nigeria and
where ROSATOM will get the funds for the construction.
“Without mincing words, for the
average Nigerian, the details are scary enough. We reject the nuclear option
for power generation because they are dangerous and we do not have the capacity
to manage the potential disaster a nuclear breach may cause.
“We advocate the renewal of the
Nigerian grid and energy sector. In doing this, renewables are the way to go
since they make for both profitable business and safety. We do not support the
dirty, unsafe and expensive reactors this government has agreed to build,” Ojo
insisted.
Comments
Post a Comment