180 countries to hold tobacco industry legally liable for tobacco harms
Jakpor |
After one week of heated
negotiations and intrigues, governments representing nearly more than 90
percent of the world’s population who attended the seventh session of the World
Health Organization’s global tobacco treaty negotiations in New Delhi, India
adopted policies that will protect public health over the narrow interests of
the tobacco industry.
These include tools to hold Big
Tobacco legally liable for the harms of its products, recover healthcare costs,
facilitate access to justice for victims of tobacco-related disease, and
safeguard public health policymaking from the industry at the national level.
Governments unanimously adopted
the suite of public health measures over the objections of the tobacco
industry. Throughout the negotiations to the treaty, formally the Framework
Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC), the industry tried to undermine the talks
via government delegations, industry front groups, lobbying, and other means.
Despite these tactics, governments adopted decisions, like advancements on
legal liability, that could provide precedent for holding other industries
accountable for the environmental and public health harms they cause.
“The tobacco industry is the
single largest barrier to tobacco control policies globally—and these
negotiations were no exception,” said John Stewart, deputy campaigns director
at Corporate Accountability International. “We applaud the delegates that stood
up to the industry and rejected their rhetoric. It is thanks to them that
governments have now adopted some of the strongest measures yet to protect
millions of people’s lives.”
At the negotiations which held
7-12 November 2016, governments agreed to expand the expertise and case studies
available to file legal and civil suits against Big Tobacco. The decision,
which advances Article 19 of the global tobacco treaty, opens the door for
governments to sue the industry and recoup millions of dollars for the health
care costs associated with tobacco use. It could also provide precedents for
people to pursue legal liability for other industries that affect public health
and the environment, like the fossil fuel industry. To date, a handful of
countries have utilized the principles contained in Article 19. For instance,
Canadian smokers recently won a $15 billion payout from the industry, after an
historic 17-year legal suit.
“At these negotiations,
governments said ‘enough is enough’ when it comes to tobacco industry
interference in their public health policies,” said Philip Jakpor, Nigeria
spokesperson of Network for Accountability of Tobacco Transnationals (NATT).
“Together, they advanced policies that will push Big Tobacco out of the way,
and let public officials do their jobs: saving people's lives.”
“For years, the tobacco industry
has intimidated countries with threats of legal suits for their common-sense
public health laws,” said Hellen Neima, tobacco control advocate from Uganda.
“At these negotiations, governments set the stage for the kinds of legal
challenges that have the potential to bankrupt the tobacco industry in the
years to come.”
Governments also advanced
policies to protect public health policymaking from the tobacco industry. The
decision, which advances the backbone of the global tobacco treaty known as
Article 5.3, will establish a centralized knowledge hub for research and
expertise on Big Tobacco’s attempts to water-down policies related to tobacco
control. It directly addresses the industry’s long history of interference in
public health. For instance, last year, a British American Tobacco
whistleblower revealed that the corporation had bribed an FCTC official to
represent its interests at negotiations for the Illicit Trade Protocol.
Additional outcomes included:
•ensuring that the FCTC
Secretariat joins the UN treaty on Business and Human Rights as an observer
•advancements to the Illicit
Trade Protocol and protections against the industry’s use of trade and
investment partnerships to undermine public health laws
•Indentifying and advancing means
to strengthen implementation of the treaty at the national level.
Comments
Post a Comment